Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Technological Choice in Textile Industry Revisited: The Handloom - Powerloom Controversy


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, D.A.V. College, Gorakhpur, U.P., India
2 Center for the Study of Regional Development, SSS, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Kanpur as an industrial centre has experienced de-industrialisation after independence. The worst sufferer has been the organised textile mill sector, which is simply non-existent today. The resultant vacuum has been filled by unorganlsed textile sector, namely handloom and powerloom. This paper re-examines the handloom-powerloom controversy in the context of unorganised textile sector of Kanpur and concludes that it cannot be said that handloom and powerloom are always employment and growth maximising respectively. Rather, many a times the converse is true.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 383

PDF Views: 0




  • Technological Choice in Textile Industry Revisited: The Handloom - Powerloom Controversy

Abstract Views: 383  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nripendra K. Mishra
Department of Economics, D.A.V. College, Gorakhpur, U.P., India
Ravi S. Srivastava
Center for the Study of Regional Development, SSS, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Kanpur as an industrial centre has experienced de-industrialisation after independence. The worst sufferer has been the organised textile mill sector, which is simply non-existent today. The resultant vacuum has been filled by unorganlsed textile sector, namely handloom and powerloom. This paper re-examines the handloom-powerloom controversy in the context of unorganised textile sector of Kanpur and concludes that it cannot be said that handloom and powerloom are always employment and growth maximising respectively. Rather, many a times the converse is true.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2004%2Fv46%2Fi3-4%2F115368