Open Access Subscription Access
Open Access Subscription Access
Family Income:The Effects on Temperament of Twins Inbagar Zone
The present study was conducted in four districts namely; Hisar Fatehabad, Rohtak and Jind of Haryana state with the purpose of availability of maximum numbers of twins in the required age group of 4 -10 years identified under UGC project of the department. A sample of 296 pairs of twins in the age group of 6- 10 years will be taken. The dimensions of temperament were assessed individually. A variable is the set of value that forms a classification. A value is anything which can be predicted. Temperament was taken as dependent variable and family income was taken as independent variable. The Malhotra Temperament Schedule (MTS) developed by Malhotra and Malhotra (1988) was used to assess child’s temperament. This schedule can be used on all child populations whether normal or abnormal, within an age range of 4-10 years of both sexes and of any socio-economic class. Malhotra Temperament Schedule consists of nine dimensions or variables of child’s temperament and the operational terms of these dimensions are given as: Activity, rhythmicity approach or withdrawal, adaptability, threshold of responsiveness, intensity of reaction, quality of mood, distractibility, attention span and persistence. These nine dimensions were further grouped into five categories namely sociability, emotionality, energy, attentivity/ distractibility and rhythmicity. To arrive at factor scores the means of the constituting temperament dimension are to be added. The Malhotra Temperament Schedule (MTS) schedule measured temperament variables on a 5 point rating scale and categorized by standardized method. Result revealed that family income was non-significantly associated with sociability (χ2=5.23), emotionality (χ2=2.34), energy (χ2=3.39), distractibility (χ2=1.63), rhythmicity (χ2=0.40) and total temperament (χ2=2.25) of twins.
Temperament, Family Income, Personality Traits, Twins, Behaviour, Children, Emotions, Development.
- Barrick, M. R., Parks, I. and Mount, M. K. (2005). Self-monitoring as a moderator of the Relationships between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58:745-767.
- Hill, J. (2012). Biological, psychological and social processes in the conduct disorders. J. Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 43:133-165.
- Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Zentner, M. R. and Peterson, E. (2005). Infant temperament and anxious symptoms in school age children. Development & Psychopathology, 11 : 209-224.
- Malhotra, S. and Malhotra, A. (1988). Malhotras temperament schedule (M.T.S.). National Psychological Publishing Corporation, Kacheri Ghat, Agra (U.P.) India.
- Shaffer, R. and Kipp, S. (2007). Mothers’ appraisal of goodness of fit and children’s social development. Internat. J. Behavioural Development. http://jbd. sagepub.com.
- Steinberg, L. (2014). The 10 basic principles of good parenting. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
- Syeda, K.F. and Haider, Hussain S. (2009). Study of personality difference among identical twins and fraternal twin in Pakistan. J. Research Scientific Personality, 46 (2):101114.
- Tellegen, A. and Waller, N. G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. In: Boyle, G.J., Matthews, G., Saklofske, D.H., Editors. Handbook of personality theory and testing : 2. Personality measurement and assessment. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA. 261-292 pp.
- Walker, S., Berthelsen, D. and Irving, K. (2001).Temperament and peer acceptance in early childhood: sex and social status differences. Child Study J., 31(3) : 177-192.
Abstract Views: 64
PDF Views: 0