Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Long Run Behavior of Equity Returns: An Exploration of Indian Experience


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce and Management Studies, Government College, Thrissur, Kerala, 680014, India
2 Department of Applied Economics, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The absence of information efficiency in a market signals the possibility of abnormal returns to investors. Understanding the pattern of past price changes or assessing the strength of fundamentals can do this for investors.By using Indian data for the period of 2000-2010 this paper first explores the long run behavior of stock returns and then investigates the explanatory power of past price changes in predicting future asset returns. Binomial and Runs tests provide the conclusive evidence for the non-random behavior of stock returns. Auto Correlation Function and Ljung- Box Q-statistic find the forecasts of future returns based on simply extrapolating the historical stock prices are dubious.The findings of the study propose chances for investors in Indian market to earn extra returns by pursuing fundamental approach to stock valuation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bae CS. and Duvall JG. An Empirical Analysis of Market and Industry factors in StockReturns of U.S. Aerospace Industry. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions. 9 (2); 1996: 85-94.
  • Branes P. Thin trading and stock market efficiency: A case of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 13(4); 1986: 609- 617.
  • Brealy RA. An Introduction to Risk and Return from Common Stocks. M.I.T, Cambridge, Mass. 1983.
  • Brown SJ, Kumar A and Goetzman WN. Dow Theory: William Peter Hamilton’s Track Record Re-Considered. The Journal of Finance. LIII (4); 1998: 1311-1332.
  • Campell RH. Predictable Risk and Returns in Emerging Markets. NBER Working Paper No. 4621 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1994.
  • Cauchie SV and Isakov D.The Determinants of Stock Returns in a Small Open Economy. 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=391996.
  • Chang KP and Ting KS. A variance Ratio Test of the Random Walk Hypothesis for Taiwan’s Stock Market. Applied Financial Economics. 10; 2000: 525-532.
  • Chiang R; Liu P and Okunev J. Modeling mean reversion of asset prices towards their fundamental values. Journal of Banking and Finance. 19(8); 1995:1327-1340.
  • Courteau L; Kao J; Keefe T and Richardson G. Relative accuracy and Predictive ability of direct valuation methods, price to aggregate earnings method and a hybrid approach. 46; 2006: 553- 575.
  • Gujarati DN. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill International, New York. 2005.
  • Fama E. Efficient Capital Markets II. Journal of Finance. 26(5); 1991:1575-1617.
  • Gupta R and Basu PK. Weak Form Efficiency in Indian Stock Markets. IBER Journal. 6(3); 2007: 57-64.
  • Jegadeesh N and Titman S. Profitability of momentum strategies: an evaluation of alternative explanations. Journal of Finance. 56; 2001: 699-720.
  • Karemera, D, Ojah K and Cole JA. Random Walks and Market Efficiency Tests: Evidence from Emerging Equity Markets. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.13; 1999: 171- 188
  • Kendall M. The Analysis of Economic Time Series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 96; 1953: 13-32.
  • Lo A and MacKinlay A. Stock Market Prices Do not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test. The Review of Financial Studies.1; 1988: 897-916.
  • Ljung G and Box GEP. Box. On a Measure of Lack of Fit in Time Series Models. Biometrika. 66; 1978: 67-72.
  • Samuelson PA. Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly. Industrial Management Review. 6(2); 1965: 41-48.
  • Mohanty P. Evidence of Size Effect on Stock Returns in India. Vikalpa. 27(3); 2002: 27-37.
  • Khababa N. Behavior of stock prices in the Saudi Arabian Financial Market: Empirical research findings.Journal of Financial Management and Analysis. 11(1); 1998: 48-55.
  • Poshakwale S. Evidence on Weak Form Efficiency and Day of the Week Effect in the Indian Stock Market. Finance India. 10(3); 1996: 605-616.
  • Ramasastri S. Market Efficiency in the Nineties: testing Unit Roots. Prajnan..28; 1999: 155-161.
  • Samanta P. Evolving weak form informational efficiency of Indian stock market. Journal of Quantitative economics. New Series-2; 2004. Srinivasan P. Testing Weak form Efficiency of Indian Stock markets. APJRBM. 1 (2); 2010

Abstract Views: 378

PDF Views: 0




  • Long Run Behavior of Equity Returns: An Exploration of Indian Experience

Abstract Views: 378  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

T. G. Saji
Department of Commerce and Management Studies, Government College, Thrissur, Kerala, 680014, India
S. Harikumar
Department of Applied Economics, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India

Abstract


The absence of information efficiency in a market signals the possibility of abnormal returns to investors. Understanding the pattern of past price changes or assessing the strength of fundamentals can do this for investors.By using Indian data for the period of 2000-2010 this paper first explores the long run behavior of stock returns and then investigates the explanatory power of past price changes in predicting future asset returns. Binomial and Runs tests provide the conclusive evidence for the non-random behavior of stock returns. Auto Correlation Function and Ljung- Box Q-statistic find the forecasts of future returns based on simply extrapolating the historical stock prices are dubious.The findings of the study propose chances for investors in Indian market to earn extra returns by pursuing fundamental approach to stock valuation.

References