Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis the Impact of Classical Management Approaches on the Management Practices


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce Keshav Mahavidyalya, University of Delhi, H-4-5 Zone, Pitampura, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Classical Approaches originated in the late of 19th Century and one of the oldest approaches; which represents traditional thoughts in management and based on the prototype industrial and military organization. The classical writers included Taylor, Fayol, Weber, Gullick, and Urwick, Mooney and Reiley and others and all they placed emphasis on work planning, the technical requirements, principles of management, formal structure, and the assumption of rational and logical behaviour, industrial management, including specialization, efficiency, higher quality, cost reduction and management-worker relationships. F.W. Taylor insisted on application of scientific methods to the problems of management. Henri Fayol suggested fourteen principles of management and their universal application. Max Weber introduced rationality in organisation, division of labour, specialization, structure, personnel competency, etc. Management is the study of managerial experiences. Classical treated organisation as a closed system. They ignored the element of human beings. Principles and functions of management have universal application. The study has been assessing the extent of applications of these theories in modern business scenario and analyzes relevance of these theories in organizations. The research paper is of descriptive in nature and assesses the impact of classical approaches on the current organizational practices. The study realized that organization must have to understand, accommodate, embrace and promote people dynamics to achieve production efficiency and effectively. Organizations should also review periodically their rules, regulations and manuals to ensure current trends in the business environment. Finally, that organization should allow for initiative, innovations and workers participation in decision making. The study evaluated current level of waste and labour turnover, layoff of workers, slow pace of growth and closure are caused by the application of the theories in management practice of the organizations.

Keywords

Classical Approaches, Scientific, Administrative, Bureaucracy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bennis, W. (1989), On Becoming Leader.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management leadership
  • Barnard, C. I. 1968. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Boulding, K. E. 1950. A Reconstruction of Economics. New York: Wiley.
  • Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A., and Kim, M. 1987. "Organizational Dysfunctions of Decline." Academy of Management Journal 30: 126-138.
  • Chandler, A. D., Jr. 1962. Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
  • Child, J., and Kieser, A. 1981. "Development of organizations over time." In Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cole, G. (2004). Management Theories and Practices, 6th ed. London, Thompson Publication.
  • Drucker, P.F. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities and Practices. New York: Harper
  • And Row
  • Drucker, P. F. 1974. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Fitch, G. H. 1976. "Achieving corporate social responsibility." Academy of Management Review. New York: Jeremy
  • Harrigan, K. R. 1980. Strategies for Declining Businesses. Lexington, MA: Heath. Harrigan, K. R. 1981. "Deterrents to divestiture." Academy of Management Journal. 24(2): 306-323.
  • Harrigan, K. R. 1982. "Exit decisions in mature industries." Academy of Management Journal. 24(4): 707-732.
  • George Jr, C.S., The History of Management Thought. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Inc.1972.[11]
  • Griffin, R.W, Management, 8thed.Newyork, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006.[15]
  • Gilbreth, F. B., Gilbreth, F.M.(1917). Applied Motion Study. New York: Sturgis Walton.
  • Grey, C. (2005). A very Short Book about Studying Organization. London, Sage Publication.
  • Haber, S. (1964). Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hannagan, T. (2005). Management Concepts and Practice (4th Ed.). England: FT Prentice Hall.
  • Hitt, Michael A, Middle mist, R Dennis and Mathis, Robert L. Effective Management: New York: West Publishing Company, 1979.[9]
  • Kast, F. E., and Rosenzweig, J. E. 1972. "General systems theory: Applications for organizations and management." Academy of Management Journal. 15(4): 451.
  • Koontz, H. (1980). The Management Theory. Academy of Management Review. April1980. www. analytictech. com /mb021 /foyal /html International Journal of Social Sciences and Education ISSN: 2223-4934 Volume: 2 Issue: 1 January 2012, 522, International Journal of Social Sciences
  • and Education ISSN: 2223-4934 Volume: 2 Issue: 1 January 2012.
  • Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, J. W. 1969. Organization and Environment. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  • Meyer, M. W. 1977. Theory of Organizational Structure. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Marris, R. L., and Wood, A. 1971. The Corporate Economy. London: Macmillan.
  • Mayo, E. 1933. The Human Problems of Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan.
  • Mooney, J.D., and Reiley, A. C. (1931). Onward Industry. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Murray, A. (2011). What is Difference between Management and Leadership? Harper Business.
  • Olum, Y. (2004). Modern Management Theories and Practices. Uganda: Makerere University.
  • Onkar, M. (2009). Henry Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management. www.linkedin.com/in/manajonker www.bizcovering.com/management/the concept of classical Management
  • Nystrom, P. C., and Starbuck, W. H. 1984. "To avoid organizational crisis, unlearn." Organizational Dynamics Spring: 53-65.
  • Pascale, R. T. 1990. Managing on the Edge. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Peck, M. S. 1987. The Different Drum New York: Simon and Schuster
  • Perrow, C. 1979. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman. Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Porter, M. 1980. "Competitive strategy in declining industries." In Competitive Strategy. Porter, M. (ed.) p. 254-274. New York: Free Press.
  • Pindur, W., Rogers, S., and Kim, P. (1995). The History of Management: A Global Perspective. Volume 1, Number 1 pp 5977. Journal of Management History.
  • Shake, S.H. (2008). Management Theories History and Practice.
  • Shied, M. (2010). The Definition of Management: Examining the Great Leader. www. Leadership 501.com
  • Stoner, J. A. F., Freeman, R. E, and Danial, R. (2003). Management 6th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India
  • Scott, W. R. 1981. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Simon, H. A. 1945. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Singh, A. 1971. Take-over. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, A. 1937. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. (1776) Cannan, E. (ed.) New York: Random House. p. 423.
  • Starbuck, W. H. 1976. "Organizations and their environments." In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dunnette, M. D. (ed.) p. 1069-1123. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Taylor, F. W. (1917). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper Uris, Warwick, D. P. (1975). A Theory of Public Bureaucracy. Cambridge M.A: Harvard University Press
  • Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A.M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1947.
  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Henderson, A.M. and Parson, T. (translation). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Weihrich, H. and Koontz, H. (1993). Management A Global Perspective 10th Ed. New Delhi, Tata McGraw www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_styles
  • Wren, D.A. The Evolution of Management Thought, 4th ed., New York,
  • Wiley, 1994.[6] Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. Management of Organizational Behavior 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall., 1977. [7]
  • Warwick, D. P. 1975. A Theory of Public Bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations. Henderson, A. M., and Parsons, T. (trans.) New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Whetten, D. A. 1987. "Organizational growth and decline processes." In Readings in Organizational Decline. Cameron, K. S., Sutton, R. I., and Whetten, D. A. (eds.) 1988. p. 27-44. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Wilson, E. 1980. Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Zammuto, R. F., and Cameron, K. S. 1985. Environmental decline and organizational response." In Research in Organizational Behavior. Straw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.) p. 223-262. Greenwich, CN: JAI.

Abstract Views: 240

PDF Views: 0




  • Analysis the Impact of Classical Management Approaches on the Management Practices

Abstract Views: 240  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pardeep Kumar
Department of Commerce Keshav Mahavidyalya, University of Delhi, H-4-5 Zone, Pitampura, Delhi, India

Abstract


Classical Approaches originated in the late of 19th Century and one of the oldest approaches; which represents traditional thoughts in management and based on the prototype industrial and military organization. The classical writers included Taylor, Fayol, Weber, Gullick, and Urwick, Mooney and Reiley and others and all they placed emphasis on work planning, the technical requirements, principles of management, formal structure, and the assumption of rational and logical behaviour, industrial management, including specialization, efficiency, higher quality, cost reduction and management-worker relationships. F.W. Taylor insisted on application of scientific methods to the problems of management. Henri Fayol suggested fourteen principles of management and their universal application. Max Weber introduced rationality in organisation, division of labour, specialization, structure, personnel competency, etc. Management is the study of managerial experiences. Classical treated organisation as a closed system. They ignored the element of human beings. Principles and functions of management have universal application. The study has been assessing the extent of applications of these theories in modern business scenario and analyzes relevance of these theories in organizations. The research paper is of descriptive in nature and assesses the impact of classical approaches on the current organizational practices. The study realized that organization must have to understand, accommodate, embrace and promote people dynamics to achieve production efficiency and effectively. Organizations should also review periodically their rules, regulations and manuals to ensure current trends in the business environment. Finally, that organization should allow for initiative, innovations and workers participation in decision making. The study evaluated current level of waste and labour turnover, layoff of workers, slow pace of growth and closure are caused by the application of the theories in management practice of the organizations.

Keywords


Classical Approaches, Scientific, Administrative, Bureaucracy.

References