Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Student Engagement and its Effect on Student’s Growth and Performance Being a Consumer of Educational Institutions and Facilitating Holistic Learning in India


Affiliations
1 Dayal Bagh Educational Institute, Agra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The amount of time that a student dedicates in the activities related to the educational institute which further help the student in his holistic development, growth and learning is known as student engagement. The paper focuses upon the relationship shared between the variables of student engagement. The National survey of student engagement has highlighted four essential dimensions of engagement which are (1) Academic Challenges (2) Learning with the Peers (3) Experience with the Faculty (4) Campus Environment. The connection between these benchmarks and their effect on the student’s performance was tested is studied in this paper. The researcher measured the relationship between them with the help of correlation and the amount of relationship was tested using regression. The study was conducted on the students and teachers of the top colleges of Agra and Mathura region and the results of both were compared. For gaining more insights and better understanding the researcher analyzed the effect of the benchmarks of student engagement on student’s performance using system dynamics modeling. It was found that Academic Challenges, Learning with the Peers and Campus Environment are highly correlated and experience with the faculty has less correlation. But all the four together has shown a better result on the performance of the students both in graduate as well as post graduate level courses.

Keywords

Student Engagement, Performance, Academic Challenges, Learning with the Peers, Experience with the Faculty, Campus Environment, Holistic Learning.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adena M. Klem, J. P. (2004). Relationships Matter: Linking Teacher Support to Student Engagement and Achievement. Journal of School Health, 74 (7), 1-12.

  • Atnip, B. R. (2015). Assessing the Relationship Between Student and Faculty Perceptions of Student Engagement at Central Mountain College. Lincoln.

  • Carey, P. (2013). Student engagement in university decision-making: policies,processes and the student voice. United kingdom.

  • Chun-Mei Zhao, G. D. (2004). Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement.Research in Higher Education,45( 2),115-138

  • Derek, l. (2013). A review of the student engagement literature. Focus on colleges, universities, and schools, 7 (1), 1-8.

  • Ellen A. Skinner, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School year. Journal of Education Psychology , 1-11.

  • Engagement, N. S. (2013). A fresh look at students Engagement. Bloomington.

  • George D. Kuh, J. K. (2006). What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature.

  • George D. Kuh, T. M. (2008). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79 (5), 540-563.

  • Giuseppe Iaria, H. H. (2008). Assessing Student Engagement in Small and Large Classes.

  • GUNUC, D. S. (2014). The Relationship between Student Engagement and Their Academic Development. 5 (4), 1-16.

  • Irem Inceoglu, N. S. (2011). Student Engagement In The Context Of Work Based Learning As An Unconventional Form Of Higher Education. 1, 1-9.

  • Jalynn Roberts, M. N. (2007). Student Involvement/Engagement in Higher Education Based on Student Origin. Research in Higher Education Journal , 2-8.

  • Korobova, N. (2012). A comparative study of student engagement,satisfaction, and academic success among international and American students. 5-205.

  • Leah Taylor, J. P. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14 (1).

  • Mandernach, B. J. (2015, June). Assessment of Student Engagement in Higher Education: A Synthesis of Literature and Assessment Tools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research , 1-14.

  • Mccolskey, J. A. (2012). The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. U.S.A: Springer Science+Business Media.

  • Mick Healey, A. F. (2014). Engagement through partnership:students as partners in learning and teaching in Higher Education. UK.

  • Ndudzo, D. (2013). An Evaluation of Student Engagement in the Odl Higher Education Context in Zimbabwe. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 15 (2), 57-66.

  • P. C. Pimentel Bótas, G. M. (2013). Student Engagement in Learning and Teaching Quality Management: A Study of UK Practices. Bath: Quality Assurance Agency.

  • Paul D. Umbach, M. R. (1900). Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement. Bloomington.

  • Rhoades, G. (2012). Faculty Engagement to Enhance Student Attainment . Arizona.

  • Robert M. Carini, G. D. (2004). Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages. San Diego.

  • Shelley R. Hart, K. S. (2011). The Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ) and the Teacher Engagement Report Form-New (TERF-N): Examining the Preliminary Evidence. 15, 2-68.

  • Stuart, R. M. (2015). Transnational Student Engagement:The Invisible Students? Austria.

  • Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. England.

  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. U.S.A.

  • Willms, j. D. (2000). Student engagement at school: a sense of belonging and participation. Pisa.

  • Chris Ward, D. Y. (2009). Exploring The Relationship Between Student Engagement And Common Business Knowledge: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Business Education, 2 (9).

  • Astin, A .W . (1984) Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education . Journal of College Student Development . 25, pp . 297–308 .

  • Astin, A .W . (1993) What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

  • Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Baron, P. and Corbin, L. (2012) Student engagement: rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research and Development 31:6, 759-772.

  • Chickering, A .W .andGamson, Z .F . (1987) Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education . AAHE Bulletin . 39 (7), pp . 3–7

  • Chickering, A .W .andReisser, L . (1993) Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Christie, H ., Munro, M . and Wager, F . (2005) ‘Day Students’ in Higher Education: Widening Access Students and Successful Transition to University Life . International Studies in Sociology of Education. 15 (1), pp . 3–29.

  • Carlson, S. (2005). The Net Generation goes to college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Section: Information Technology, 52(7), A34

  • Coates, H . (2005) The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance Quality in Higher Education . 11 (1), pp . 25–36.

  • Carter, M., McGee, R., Taylor, B., & Williams, S. (2007). Health outcomes in adolescence: Associations with family, friends and school engagement. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.04.002

  • Coates, H. (2007) A Model of Online and General Campus-Based Student Engagement Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education . 32 (2), pp .121–141.

  • Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1), 59-109.

  • Freud, S. (1922) in Ferguson, A. (2007) ‘Employee engagement: Does it exist, and if so, how does it relate to performance, other constructs and individual differences?’

  • Hand, L. and Bryson, C. (2008) Student Engagement. London: Staff and Educational Development Association (SEDA)

  • Higher Education Academy (2010) Framework for action: enhancing student engagement at the institutional level. York: The Higher Education Academy (HEA).

  • James, R., Krause, K.-L.and Jennings, C. (2010) The first-year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994-2009. Melbourne, Australia: centre for the Study of Higher Education.

  • Leslie, D., &Fretwell, E. (1996). Wise moves in hard times: Creating and managing resilient colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Kuh, G. D., Douglas, K. B., Lund, J. P., &RaminGyurnek, J. (1994). Student learning outside the classroom: Transcending artificial boundaries (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8). Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC.

  • Kuh, G. (1995) The other curriculum: out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development, Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123-155

  • Kuh, G. (2001) The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties (Bloomington, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research).

  • Kuh, G., Gonyea, R. & Williams, J. (2005) What students expect from college and what they get, in: T. Miller, B. Bender, J. Schuh and associates (Eds) Promoting reasonable expectations (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).

  • Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. & Whitt, E. (2005) Student success in college (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).

  • Parsons, J. McRae, P. & Taylor, L. (2006) Celebrating School Improvement: Six Lessons from Alberta’s AISI Projects. Edmonton: School Improvement Press.

  • QAA (2012) UK Quality Code for Higher Education. Part B: Chapter B5: Student Engagement. Gloucester: QAA The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B. &Shernoff, E. (2003).Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176.

  • Trowler, V. (2010) Student Engagement Literature Review. York: HEA Higher Education Academy.

  • Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., and Nora, A. (2001). Influences on Students' Openness to Diversity and Challenge in the Second and Third Years of College. Influences on students' openness to diversity and challenge in the second and third years of college. Journal of Higher Education 72(2): 172-204.

  • Whipple, W. R. (1987). Collaborative learning. AAHE Bulletin 40(2): 3-7.

  • Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010).Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167-177.

  • www.scholarship.nic.in


Abstract Views: 183

PDF Views: 0




  • Student Engagement and its Effect on Student’s Growth and Performance Being a Consumer of Educational Institutions and Facilitating Holistic Learning in India

Abstract Views: 183  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Aarti Sharma
Dayal Bagh Educational Institute, Agra, India
K. Santi Swarup
Dayal Bagh Educational Institute, Agra, India

Abstract


The amount of time that a student dedicates in the activities related to the educational institute which further help the student in his holistic development, growth and learning is known as student engagement. The paper focuses upon the relationship shared between the variables of student engagement. The National survey of student engagement has highlighted four essential dimensions of engagement which are (1) Academic Challenges (2) Learning with the Peers (3) Experience with the Faculty (4) Campus Environment. The connection between these benchmarks and their effect on the student’s performance was tested is studied in this paper. The researcher measured the relationship between them with the help of correlation and the amount of relationship was tested using regression. The study was conducted on the students and teachers of the top colleges of Agra and Mathura region and the results of both were compared. For gaining more insights and better understanding the researcher analyzed the effect of the benchmarks of student engagement on student’s performance using system dynamics modeling. It was found that Academic Challenges, Learning with the Peers and Campus Environment are highly correlated and experience with the faculty has less correlation. But all the four together has shown a better result on the performance of the students both in graduate as well as post graduate level courses.

Keywords


Student Engagement, Performance, Academic Challenges, Learning with the Peers, Experience with the Faculty, Campus Environment, Holistic Learning.

References