Asian Journal of Home Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Self-Regulation and Metacognitive Skillfulness Among Adolescents


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study aims to investigate the relationship between varying dimensions of self-regulation and the two components of metacognition. Metacognition and self-regulation should be explored as a serious issue in the educational context as both aim at helping learners to think about their own learning more explicitly. The sample for this study comprised 400 adolescents studying in class +1 and +2, exclusively drawn from the Government Senior Secondary Schools of rural and urban areas of Ludhiana and Moga districts of Punjab. The subjects were randomly selected and equally distributed over gender (males=200 and females=200) and locale (urban=200 and rural =200). Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Schraw and Dennison, 1994) and Self-Regulation Questionnaire (Brown et al., 1999) were used to assessthe metacognition and self-regulation of adolescents, respectively. Irrespective of gender and locale, the results of Pearson Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between overall self-regulation and the components of metacognition (Knowledge about Cognition and Regulation of Cognition) as well as overall metacognition. Similar results were also observed in case of female respondents as well as the rural respondents, where a significant positive correlation was found between self-regulation and metacognition.

Keywords

Adolescents, Metacognition, Self-Regulation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. Eur. Psychol., 1: 100-112.

  • Brown, J.M., Miller, W.R. and Lawendowski, L.A. (1999). The Self-Regulation Questionnaire. In: L. Vande Creek and T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book, pp. 281-289. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

  • Cornoldi, C., Vecchia, R. Dalla and Tressoldi, P. E. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory limitations in low Visuo-spatial high verbal intelligence children. J. Child Psychol. & Psychiatry, 36 (6): p. 1053-1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14697610. 1995.tb01350.x.

  • Cornoldi, C. (2010). Metacognition, intelligence and academic performance. In: H.S. Waters and W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction, pp. 257-277. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

  • Dignath, C. Buettner, G. and Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programs. Edu. Res. Rev-neth., 3: 101-29.

  • Dunlosky, J. and Thiede, K.W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect people’s selfpaced study and yield “labor-and-gain” effects. Acta. Psychol., 98 : 37–56.

  • Elliot, A.J., McGregor, H.A. and Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a meditational analysis. J. Edu. Psychol.,91: 549-63.

  • Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol., 34 : 906-915.

  • Fox, E. and Riconscente, M.M. (2008). Metacognition and selfregulation in James, Piaget and Vygotsky. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 20 : 373-389.

  • Kanfer, F.H. (1970a). Self-monitoring: Methodological limitations and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psych., 35 : 148-152.

  • Kanfer, F.H. (1970b). Self-regulation: Research, issues and speculation. In: C. Neuringer and J. L. Michael (Eds.) Behavior modification in clinical psychology, pp. 178-220. AppletonCentury-Crofts, New York, U.S.A.

  • Luwel, K., Torbey, J. and Verschaffel, L. (2003). The relation between meta-strategy knowledge, strategy use and task performance: findings and reflections from a tuberosity judgment task. Eur. J. Psychol. Edu.,18: 425-447.

  • Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B. (1989). Learning how to learn. M.A: M.I.T. Press Cambridge, New York, U.S.A.

  • Paris, S. and Oka, E. (1986).Children’s reading strategies, metacognition and motivation. Dev. Rev., 6: 25-56.

  • Pintrich, P.R. and DeGischolar_main, E. (1990). Motivation al and selfregulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Edu. Psychol., 82: 33-40.

  • Schraw, G. and Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp. Educ. Psychol.,19: 460-475.

  • Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Self-Regulation in Education: Retrospect and Prospect. In :D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.) Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Sindhwani, A. and Sharma, M.K. (2013). Metacognitive learning skills. Educationia Confab, 4 : 68-79.

  • Sperling, R.A., Howard, B.C., Staley, R. and Dubois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Edu. Res. Eval., 10: 117-139.

  • Wolters, C.A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: using goals structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition and achievement. J. Edu. Psychol., 96: 236-250.

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of selfregulated academic learning. J. Edu. Psychol., 81: 329-339.

  • Zimmerman, B.J. and Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J. Edu. Psychol., 82 : 51–59.

  • Cornoldi, Cesare, Dalla, Vecchia R. and Tressoldi, P. E. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory limitations in low visuo-spatial high verbal intelligence children. J. Child Psychol. & Psychiatry, 36 (6): https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01350.x


Abstract Views: 281

PDF Views: 0




  • Self-Regulation and Metacognitive Skillfulness Among Adolescents

Abstract Views: 281  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Parvinder Kaur
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India
Sarita Saini
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India
Deepika Vig
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India

Abstract


The present study aims to investigate the relationship between varying dimensions of self-regulation and the two components of metacognition. Metacognition and self-regulation should be explored as a serious issue in the educational context as both aim at helping learners to think about their own learning more explicitly. The sample for this study comprised 400 adolescents studying in class +1 and +2, exclusively drawn from the Government Senior Secondary Schools of rural and urban areas of Ludhiana and Moga districts of Punjab. The subjects were randomly selected and equally distributed over gender (males=200 and females=200) and locale (urban=200 and rural =200). Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Schraw and Dennison, 1994) and Self-Regulation Questionnaire (Brown et al., 1999) were used to assessthe metacognition and self-regulation of adolescents, respectively. Irrespective of gender and locale, the results of Pearson Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between overall self-regulation and the components of metacognition (Knowledge about Cognition and Regulation of Cognition) as well as overall metacognition. Similar results were also observed in case of female respondents as well as the rural respondents, where a significant positive correlation was found between self-regulation and metacognition.

Keywords


Adolescents, Metacognition, Self-Regulation.

References