Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bashir, Rubiqua
- Multivariate Analysis and Choice of Parent for Hybridization in Apple (Malus X domestica Borkh.)
Abstract Views :270 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Fruit Breeding and Genetic Resourses, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and forestry, Nauni, Solan, H.P., IN
2 Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e-kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, J&K, IN
1 Department of Fruit Breeding and Genetic Resourses, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and forestry, Nauni, Solan, H.P., IN
2 Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e-kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, J&K, IN
Source
Asian Journal of Bio Science, Vol 8, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 39-42Abstract
Medium quantum of genetic divergence was observed among sixteen apple genotypes under the present study. All the genotypes, on the basis of total variability were grouped into four distinct clusters. Maximum number of cultivars were accommodated in cluster IV (Fuji, Gala, Jonadel, Jonagold, Red Fuji, Royal Gala and Spijon) followed by cluster I (Arlet, Ruspippin, Sinta and Summerred), Cluster III (Crimson Gold, Elstar and Neomi) and cluster II ('Spartan' and 'Quinte'). Cluster IV had highest intra cluster value (9.32) so was most divergent and cluster I having least intra cluster value (8.20) was least divergent. Highest value (30.331) for inter cluster distance was recorded between cluster I and II while it was lowest (9.994) between cluster III and IV. Cluster means were maximum in cluster II followed by cluster I, cluster III and cluster IV. Neomi was best cultivars for fruit yield/plant, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit weight, total sugars and non-reducing sugars, however, Jonagold was best for TSS. Cultivars Spartan, Elstar, Royal Gala, Jonagold and Summerred would prove best for different vegetative characters.Keywords
Apple, Cluster analysis, D2 statistics, Genetic divergence
References
- Awasthi, R.P. and Chauhan, P.S. (2001). Apple. In: Handbook of horticulture. K.L. Chadha, (Ed.) Indian Council of Agricultural Research, NEW DELHI (INDIA). pp. 119-131.
- Barua, U. and Sharma, R.K. (2002). Genetic variability studies in apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.). Prog. Hort., 34(2):187-191.
- Dwivedi, A.K. and Mitra, K. (1995). Genetic diversity of fruit quality traits in litchi. Hort. J., 8(2):113-118.
- George, K.C. (1976). Estimation of genetic diversity among arecanut varieties. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 4(1&2):49-56.
- Juniper, B.E., Watkin, R. and Harries, S.A. (1999). The origin of apple. Acta Hort., 484:27-30.
- Linoaiah, H.B., Reddy, N.S., Kulkarni, R.S. and Thomas, K.K. (1998). Genetic divergence in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) genotypes. In: Development in plantation crop research. Mathen, N.M, Kuruvilla, J.C., Licy, J., Joseph, T. and Meenattoor, J.R. (eds). Proceedings of the 12th symposium on plantation crops, Placrosyn XII, Kottayam, India, 27-29 Nov, 1996, pp. 28-33.
- Mercy, K.A. and George, K.C. (1987). Genetic divergence in culinary varieties of banana. Agric. Res. J. Kerala, 25(1):11-16.
- Pereira, L.S., Ramos, C.A.M., Ascasibar, E.J. and Pineiro, A.J. (2003). Analysis of apple germplasm in North Western Spain. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 120(1):67-84.
- Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometrical research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. NEW YORK (U.S.A.). pp. 357-363.
- Sharma, J.R. (1998). Statistical and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. Kalyani Publishers, NEW DELHI (INDIA). pp. 76-92.
- Singh, N.B. and Chaudhary, V.K. (1992). Multivariate analysis of genetic divergence in wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Indian J. Forestry,. 15(3):221-216.
- Xin, P.G. and Shen, X. (1992). A preliminary cluster analysis study of apple varietal biology. J. Shandong agric. Uni., 23(3):227-232.