Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Socio-Economic Profile of Dairy Farmers in Hisar District of Haryana


Affiliations
1 Department of Dairy Business Management, College of Dairy Science and Technology, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
2 Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
3 Institute of Para Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
4 Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Among the different forms of livestock farming, dairying is considered as a “treasure” of the Indian rural economy. For the design and implementation of support programmes to promote dairy farming for rural development and for adoption of new technologies in dairy, profile of the dairy farmers is an important factor in developing countries like India. By considering this aspect the study was undertaken in Hisar district of Haryana. Among the 60 dairy farmers 73.3 per cent of respondents were middle aged with mean age of about 43 years. The respondents had fairly good formal education with mean value of 4.23 which indicates that majority (96.6%) of dairy farmers were literate. Family structure of dairy farmers was 65.0 per cent of the respondents belonged to joint families and 35.0 per cent to nuclear families. The family land holding ranged from 1 to 6 acres with a mean 2.60 acres. 43.3 per cent of the respondents preferred to have a herd size of 3-5 dairy animals. The respondents in general had poor social participation with mean value as low as 0.16. Further, majority of the respondents had low level of extension contact with mean value of 2.23. Mass media exposure of dairy farmers was also low with mean value of 2.65 which indicates majority (73.3%) of dairy farmers had low level of mass media exposure. However, economic motivation of dairy farmer was fairly high with mean value of 22.56. The dairy farmers in general had medium risk orientation with mean value 18.28.

Keywords

Dairy Farmers, Socio-Economic Profile, Dairying, Rural Development, Livestock Farming.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahuja, V. (2004). Livestock and livelihoods: Challenges and opportunities for Asia in the emerging market environment. National Dairy Development Board of India and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 372 p.
  • Chauhan, D.S.,Kamble, V.J., Padghan, P.V., Sawant, R.C. and Kamble, R.R. (2004). Impact of farmers status on milk production in tribal area of Kinwat Thasil, Marashwada Region. Indian J.Anim. Res., 38 : 137-140.
  • Dana, S.S. (1987). Attitude of livestock owners towards Artificial Insemination in cattle. M.V.Sc. Thesis, IVRI, Izatnagar, U.P. (INDIA).
  • ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) (2002). Mapping Poverty and Livestock in the Developing World. ILRI, Nairobi.
  • Kumar, A. and Joshi, P.K. (2012). Structural transformation in Indian dairy sector. Report submitted to IFPRI. National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
  • Kurup, M.G.P. (1995). India- livestock sector perspectives 1995-2020. Project Report of Govt. of India, Dept. of Animal Husbandry, Ministry of Agriculture in collaboration with Swiss Development Corporation.
  • Pareek, U. and Trivedi, G. (1964). Manual of the socio-economic status-scale rural. Manasayan, DELHI, INDIA.
  • Paroda, R.S. and Kumar, P. (2000). Food production and demand in South Asia. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 13: 1-24.
  • Patange, D.D., Wangikar, S.D., Kulkarni, A.N. and Kaltankar, S.D. (2001). Effect of socio-economic variables on milk production of marathwada buffaloes. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 20: 92-96.
  • Patel, R.K. (1993). Present status and promise of dairying in India. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 48 (1): 1-33.
  • Rangnekar, D.V. (2001). Livestock production in rural systems and expected impacts of free trade, Vision 2020: food security from the grassischolar_mains perspective. Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung, Bonn, Germany.
  • Rao, P.P., Birthal, P.S. and Ndjeunga, J. (2005). Crop livestock economies in the semi-arid tropics: facts, trends and outlook. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India: 68.
  • Saha, D., Afzal, H.A. and Abdul, H. (2010). Livestock farmers’ knowledge about rearing practices in Ganderbal district of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 10 : 26-29.
  • Sharma, K., Singh, S.P. and Gautam (2011). Personal attributes affecting training needs perception of buffalo farmers. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 11: 23-25.
  • Singh, S.P. and Dalal, R.S. (2006). Extension contact and mass media exposure among buffalo owners. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 59 : 191-195.
  • Steinfeld, H. (2003). Economic constraints on production and consumption of animal source foods for nutrition in developing countries. J Nutr., 133: 4054-4061.
  • Supe, S.V. (1969). Factors related to different degree of rationality in decision making among farmers in Buldana district. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Extension, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), NEW DELHI, INDIA.
  • Wadear, P.R., Kiresur, V.R. and Gaddi, G.M. (2003). Human labour absorption in dairy farming in Karnataka – An economic analysis. Rural India., 66 (12): 243-247.
  • World Bank (2008).World Development report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
  • Anonymous (2007). Livestock census 2007, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, State Government of Haryana.Available at http://pashudhanharyana.gov.in/html/livestockcensus. htm. Accessed on May 6, 2012.
  • Anonymous (2011). District Census 2011. Available at http://www.haryanaonline.com/Districts/ hissar.htm accessed on May 6, 2012.

Abstract Views: 213

PDF Views: 0




  • Socio-Economic Profile of Dairy Farmers in Hisar District of Haryana

Abstract Views: 213  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rachna
Department of Dairy Business Management, College of Dairy Science and Technology, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
Gautam
Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
Anika Malik
Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
S. S. Sangwan
Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
Richa Khirbat
Institute of Para Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India
Kamaldeep
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajput Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (Haryana), India

Abstract


Among the different forms of livestock farming, dairying is considered as a “treasure” of the Indian rural economy. For the design and implementation of support programmes to promote dairy farming for rural development and for adoption of new technologies in dairy, profile of the dairy farmers is an important factor in developing countries like India. By considering this aspect the study was undertaken in Hisar district of Haryana. Among the 60 dairy farmers 73.3 per cent of respondents were middle aged with mean age of about 43 years. The respondents had fairly good formal education with mean value of 4.23 which indicates that majority (96.6%) of dairy farmers were literate. Family structure of dairy farmers was 65.0 per cent of the respondents belonged to joint families and 35.0 per cent to nuclear families. The family land holding ranged from 1 to 6 acres with a mean 2.60 acres. 43.3 per cent of the respondents preferred to have a herd size of 3-5 dairy animals. The respondents in general had poor social participation with mean value as low as 0.16. Further, majority of the respondents had low level of extension contact with mean value of 2.23. Mass media exposure of dairy farmers was also low with mean value of 2.65 which indicates majority (73.3%) of dairy farmers had low level of mass media exposure. However, economic motivation of dairy farmer was fairly high with mean value of 22.56. The dairy farmers in general had medium risk orientation with mean value 18.28.

Keywords


Dairy Farmers, Socio-Economic Profile, Dairying, Rural Development, Livestock Farming.

References