The Asian Journal of Animal Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Seasonal Variation of Phytoplankton Diversity, Density and Palmer’s Pollution Index of Freshwater Lake, Rural Area of Ahmedabad


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, M.G. Science Institute, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), India
2 Department of Zoology, M.G. Science Institute, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), India
3 Department of Biology, Science College, Pilvai (Gujarat), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was carried out on Manipur lake of Manipur village. The plankton were collected, counted and were identified by using the method suggested by APHA (1985); Prescott (1970) and Edmondson (1959). The planktons were counted by using Sedgwick Rafter counting cell. Different class such as cyanophyceae, chlorophyceae, bacillariophyceae and euglenophyceae. Among all these classes the listed phytoplankton such as Anabaena sp., Merismopedia sp., Ankistrodesmus sp., Actinastrum sp., Closteriopsis sp., Closteriumsp., Coelastrumsp., Crucigenia sp., Gonium sp., Pediastrumsp., Scenedesmus sp., Tetraedron sp., Amphiplrura sp., Cyclotella sp., Cymbella sp., Navicula sp., Nitzschia sp., Synedra sp., Euglena sp. and Phacus sp. were recorded in Manipur lake. The study was carried out monthly but was tabulated seasonally by using statistical method. From the listed data the quality of water was concluded. Palmer stated that composite rating of algae, tolerating organic pollution and developed an index to establish the status of the aquatic body. In this method to determine the level of organic pollution by studying the algae present in a sample of water.

Keywords

Manipur Lake, Phytoplankton, Density, Pollution Index.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • APHA (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 19th Ed, American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association and Water Pollut. Contl. Federation, Washington, D.C., NEWYORK, U.S.A.

  • Aykulu, G. (1978). A comparative study of the phytoplankton of the river Avon. Bristol. Phycol. J.,13 : 91-102.

  • Butcher, R.W. (1946). Studies on the ecology of the river. I. The algal growth in highly calcareous streamJ. Ecology, 33: 268-283.

  • Descy, J.P., Servais, P., Smitz, J.S., Billen, G. and Everbecq, E. (1987). Phytoplankton biomass and production in the river Meeuse (Belgium)Wat. Res., 21 (12) : 1557-1566.

  • Dhakar, M.L. (1979). Studies in some aspects of the hydrobiology of Indrasagar tank (South Rajasthan) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Udaipur, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • Edmondson, W.T. (1959). Fresh water biology. 2nd Ed. JhonWiley and Sons. NEWYORK, U.S.A. 1248pp.

  • Fruh, E.G. (1966). The overall picture of Eutrophication. J. Water Poll. Control. Fed. 39: 1449-1453.

  • Gonzalves, E.A. and Joshi D.B. (1946): Fresh water algae near Bombay. The seasonal succession of algae in a tank of Bandra. J. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soc., 46: 154-176.

  • Henry, R., Tundisi, J.G. and Curi, P.R. (1984). Effect of phoisphorus and nitrogen enrichment on the phytoplankton in tropical reservoir, Hydrobiologia, 118 (2): 177-186.

  • Jafari, N.G. and Gunale, V.R. (2006). Hydrobiological study of algae of an urban freshwater river. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Mgmt. 10 (2) : 153 – 158.

  • Khapekar, R.R. and Deshpande, S.V. (2007). Phytoplankton composition and assessment of pollution status of naik lake,Nagpur (M.S.), J.Aqua.Biol., 22 (2) : 21 - 26.

  • Kumar, A. (1996). Comparitive study on diel variation of abiotic factor in lentic and lotic freshwater ecosystems of Santal Paragana (Bihar). J. Environ. Pollut., 3: 83-89.

  • Oemke, D.V. and Burtan T.M. (1986). Diatom colonization dynamics in a lotic system. Hydrobiologia, 139: 153-166.

  • Palmer, C.M. (1969). A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution, J. Phycology, 5 (1) : 78-82.

  • Paramsivam, M. and Sreenivasan, A. (1981). Changes in algal flora due to pollution in Cauvery river. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 23 (3):222-238.

  • Prescott, G.W. (1970). Algae of the western great lakes areas. Pub Cranbrook Institute of Science Bulletin, 33 : 1-496.

  • Saad, M.A. and Abbas M.H. (1985). Limnological investigations on the rosetta branch of the Nile II Phytoplankton, Freshwater Biol. , 15 : 661-669.

  • Sarles, W.B. (1961). Madisons lake must urbanisation destroy their beauty and productivity. Algae and Metropolitan wastes-Tr. Of the 1960 Seminar U.S. Deparment of Health Education and Welf: pp. 10-18.

  • Sharma, N. (1983). Investigations on limnology of tank ecosystem near Allahabad with particular reference to the abundance and seasonal distribution pf plankton and benthos, Ph.D Thesis, Sagar University, Sagar, M.P. (INDIA).

  • Singh, S.R. and Swarup, K. (1979). Limnologicla studies of Saraha Lake (Ballia). II. The periodicity of phytoplankton. J. Ind. Bot.Soc., 58 : 319-329.

  • Singh, Y. (1979). Ecological studies on river algae with special; reference to Bacillariophyceae, Ph.D.Thesis, Lucknow University, Lucknow, U.P. (INDIA).

  • Solanki, H.A., Verma, P.U. and Chandawat, D.K. (2011). Evaluating the water quality of Malav lake by mean of phyco-chemical analysis. Life Sciences Leaflets, 20 : 944- 955.

  • Trivedi, R.K. and Goel, P.K. (1984). Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Envi. Media. Pub. Karad. India. pp. 215.

  • Unni, K.S. (1996). Ecology of river Narmada. A.P.H. Publishing Corporation. New Delhi, India, pp. 371.

  • Vyas, L.N. (1968). Studies on phytoplankton ecology of picchola Lake. Udaipur Proc. Symp. Recent Adv. Trop. Ecol., 334-347.

  • Washington, D.C.Rosenberg, D.M. and Resh, V.H. (1993). Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall:NEW YORK, U.S.A.


Abstract Views: 167

PDF Views: 0




  • Seasonal Variation of Phytoplankton Diversity, Density and Palmer’s Pollution Index of Freshwater Lake, Rural Area of Ahmedabad

Abstract Views: 167  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

N. R. Mulia
Department of Botany, M.G. Science Institute, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), India
N. G. Kotadiya
Department of Zoology, M.G. Science Institute, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), India
C. A. Acharya
Department of Biology, Science College, Pilvai (Gujarat), India

Abstract


The present study was carried out on Manipur lake of Manipur village. The plankton were collected, counted and were identified by using the method suggested by APHA (1985); Prescott (1970) and Edmondson (1959). The planktons were counted by using Sedgwick Rafter counting cell. Different class such as cyanophyceae, chlorophyceae, bacillariophyceae and euglenophyceae. Among all these classes the listed phytoplankton such as Anabaena sp., Merismopedia sp., Ankistrodesmus sp., Actinastrum sp., Closteriopsis sp., Closteriumsp., Coelastrumsp., Crucigenia sp., Gonium sp., Pediastrumsp., Scenedesmus sp., Tetraedron sp., Amphiplrura sp., Cyclotella sp., Cymbella sp., Navicula sp., Nitzschia sp., Synedra sp., Euglena sp. and Phacus sp. were recorded in Manipur lake. The study was carried out monthly but was tabulated seasonally by using statistical method. From the listed data the quality of water was concluded. Palmer stated that composite rating of algae, tolerating organic pollution and developed an index to establish the status of the aquatic body. In this method to determine the level of organic pollution by studying the algae present in a sample of water.

Keywords


Manipur Lake, Phytoplankton, Density, Pollution Index.

References