Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Formaldehyde Treated Concentrate, Urea and Soybean Meal on Compound Growth Rate of Milk Yield and Correlation Studies in Lactating Cows


Affiliations
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
2 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present investigation entitled “effect of formaldehyde treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on compound growth rate of milk yield and correlation studies in lactating cows” was undertaken at Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. Feeding of 1.5 per cent formaldehyde treated 70:30 sugras : SBM concentrate mixture with 2 per cent added urea diet to lactating cows (T3) was evaluated in relation to sugras untreated ration (T1). It was observed that intakes in cows were non-significantly influenced by the parameters except water intake as out of the five animals only 2 animals showed significant impact due to DMI and TDNI and none of the animals due to DCPI. The values were 0.30, 0.74, 0.30 and 0.28 per cent per week for DMI, DCPI, TDNI and TWI, respectively. This reflected in an increase of 1.14 per cent in milk yield/ week in cows. It was noticed that DCPI had a greater influence on milk yield of cows in all the groups except T5 group as the correlation values were positive and significant, being r = 0.770, 0.764 and 0.921 of high magnitude in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively and 0.588 of medium order in T4 group while it was positive but non-significant (r= 0.431) in T5 group. The correlation values observed for maximum and minimum ambient temperature were positive non-significant, being r = 0.186 and 0.137, 0.243 and 0.074, 0.324 and 0.081, 0.230 and 0.067 and 0.250 and 0.094 in T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 treatments, respectively. In contrast correlation coefficient values between RHI and daily milk yield were negative non-significant in T1, T2 and T4 treatments, being r = -0.481, -0.546 and -0.424, respectively while the association was negative significant in T3 (r = - 0.642) and in T5 ( r = - 0.778).

Keywords

Formaldehyde, Sugras, Urea, Soybean Meal, DMI, DCP, Milk Yield, Compound Growth Rate, Correlation Studies.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amble, V. N. (1975). Statistical method in animal science. Ist Ed., Published by Indian Society of Agriculture Statistics. New Delhi, India, pp. 199-219.
  • Anonymous (2001). Feeding Table 2001. Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB), Lelystad, no pp. (in Dutch).
  • Anonymous (2012). Area and production estimates of soybean in India Kharif (Monsoon) 2012 (Based on crop survey conducted by SOPA).
  • Atwal, A.S., Smahadevan, M. S. Wolynetz and Yu, Y. L. (1995). Increased milk production of cows in early lactation fed chemically treated soybean meal, J. Dairy Sci.,78 (3): 535- 603.
  • Banerji, G.C. (1998) (Reprint 2005), A textbook of animal husbandry, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co-Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp. 661-677.
  • Banerjee, G.C. (2008). A Text book of animal husbandry. Ed. 8th, Oxford and IBH Publishing. Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, pp. 340-345.
  • Bugalia, H. L., Chaudhary, J.L. and Gupta, Lokesh (2008a). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated til cake on milk yield and composition of lactating crossbred cows. IJDS. 61(2): 116-121.
  • Bugalia, H. L., Chaudhary, J.L. and Gupta, Lokesh (2008b). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.) cake on reproductive efficiency and physiological responses of crossbred cows. Anim. Nutr. & Feed Technol., 8: 219 - 226.
  • Chakravarty, A.K.(2010). Efficient breeding strategies for economic sustenance of dairy farms. Compendium of water school organized on 1030 Nov. 2010, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (HARYANA) INDIA.
  • Chatterjee, A. and Walli, T.K. (2003). Economics of feeding treated GN cake and its partial replacement with urea on growth and feed utilization in crossbred kids. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 86 (4) : 241-244.
  • Chatterjee, A. and Walli, T.K. (2003). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated mustard cake as bypass protein on milk yield and milk composition on Murrah buffaloes. IJDS, 56: 299 - 305.
  • Compeneere, Sam De., Boever, Joha, L. De, Vanacker, Jose, M. and Daniel, L. De Brabander (2010). Reducing nitrogen excretion and soybean meal use by feeding al lower rumen degradable protein balance and protected soybean meal to dairy cattle. Anim. Nutr., 64 (2) : 85-97.
  • Doskey,Kamal Noman, Dhiaa, Omar, Al-Mallah and Sulaiman, Nihet hajji (2011). Effect of feeding urea treated wheat straw and formaldehyde treated barley grains on milk composition and some blood metabolites of Meriz does. Roavs., 1(1): 700-703.
  • Garg M.R., Sherasia ,P. L., Bhandari, B. M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003a). Effect of feeding rumen protected protein on milk production in lactating buffaloes. Anim. Nutr.& Feed Technol., 3: 151-157.
  • Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhandari, B. M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003b). Effect of feeding formaldehyder treated guar meal on milk production in crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 20 (3) : 334-338.
  • Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhandari, B.M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003c). Effect of feeding rumen protected protein on milk production in lactating cows. IJDS, 56(4): 218-221.
  • Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhandari, B.M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2004). Effect of feeding protected protein on milk production and composition of lactating cows. Indian Vet. J., 81: 48-50.
  • Gulati, S.K., Scott, T.W., Garg, M.R. and Singh, D.K. (2002). An overview of rumen protected or bypass proteins and their potential to increase milk production in India. Indian Dairyman, 54 (3) : 31-35.
  • Prasad, Jagdish and Neeraj (2008). Principles and practices of animal nutrition, IInd Ed., Kalyani Publishers, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
  • Rekhate, D.H., Madavi, V.B., Dhok, A.P. and Koskewar, V.V. (2005). Utilization of gram (Cicer orientinm) straw based pelleted complete ration in goats. Indian J. Small Ruminants., 11(1) : 80-83.
  • Rekhate, D.H., Smita, Ukey, Leena, N. Mangle and Deshmukh, B.S. (2010). Effect of dietary supplementation of Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus wild) on haematobiochemical parameters of broilers. Veterinary World, 3 (6) : 280-281.
  • Sahoo, B. and Walli, T.K. (2005). Effect of feeding bypass protein as formaldehyde treated mustard cake along with energy supplement on blood metabolites and milk production in lactating goats. IJDS, 58(3): 184-189.
  • Sampath, K.T., Chandrasekharaiah, M. and Thulasi, A. (2004). Bypass protein and its relevance in feeding of Indian livestock. Proccedings of V. ANA. Conference, 26-32pp.
  • Socha, M. (1991). Effect of feeding heat processed whole soybeans on milk production, milk composition and milk fatty acid profile, M.S.Thesis. Wisconsin, Madison,WI.
  • Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical methods, 6th Ed., Oxford & IBH Publishing Company, Bombay (M.S.) INDIA.
  • Vahora, S.G., Kore, K.B. and Parnerkar, S. (2012). Feeding of formaldehyde-treated protein meals to lactating buffaloes; effect on milk yield and composition. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 24, Article #2. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/1/vaho24002.htm.
  • Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2004). Effect of feeding protected protein on nutrient utilization, milk yield and milk composition of lactating crossbred cows. IJDS. 57(6): 394-399.
  • Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2010). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated groundnut cake on nutrients digestibility and efficiency in lactating crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. , 27(4): 379-384.
  • Yeasmin, A.,Akbar, M.A., Shahjalal, M. and Ahmed, T.U. (2004). Effect of urea molasses multi–nutrient blocks supplementation of dairy cows fed rice straw and green grasses on milk yield composition, live weight gain of cows and calves and feed intake. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci., 7(9): 1523- 1525.

Abstract Views: 176

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Formaldehyde Treated Concentrate, Urea and Soybean Meal on Compound Growth Rate of Milk Yield and Correlation Studies in Lactating Cows

Abstract Views: 176  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

N. S. Chore
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
S. D. Chavan
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
R. R. Shelke
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
P. A. Kahate
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India

Abstract


Present investigation entitled “effect of formaldehyde treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on compound growth rate of milk yield and correlation studies in lactating cows” was undertaken at Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. Feeding of 1.5 per cent formaldehyde treated 70:30 sugras : SBM concentrate mixture with 2 per cent added urea diet to lactating cows (T3) was evaluated in relation to sugras untreated ration (T1). It was observed that intakes in cows were non-significantly influenced by the parameters except water intake as out of the five animals only 2 animals showed significant impact due to DMI and TDNI and none of the animals due to DCPI. The values were 0.30, 0.74, 0.30 and 0.28 per cent per week for DMI, DCPI, TDNI and TWI, respectively. This reflected in an increase of 1.14 per cent in milk yield/ week in cows. It was noticed that DCPI had a greater influence on milk yield of cows in all the groups except T5 group as the correlation values were positive and significant, being r = 0.770, 0.764 and 0.921 of high magnitude in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively and 0.588 of medium order in T4 group while it was positive but non-significant (r= 0.431) in T5 group. The correlation values observed for maximum and minimum ambient temperature were positive non-significant, being r = 0.186 and 0.137, 0.243 and 0.074, 0.324 and 0.081, 0.230 and 0.067 and 0.250 and 0.094 in T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 treatments, respectively. In contrast correlation coefficient values between RHI and daily milk yield were negative non-significant in T1, T2 and T4 treatments, being r = -0.481, -0.546 and -0.424, respectively while the association was negative significant in T3 (r = - 0.642) and in T5 ( r = - 0.778).

Keywords


Formaldehyde, Sugras, Urea, Soybean Meal, DMI, DCP, Milk Yield, Compound Growth Rate, Correlation Studies.

References