Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Use of Factor Analysis Scores in Logistic Regression Model for Predicting Chances of Adoption of E-Payment System by the Users of Smart Phones
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The launching of UPI (Unified payment interface), Demonetisation and the linking of biometric identification with bank accounts and mobile numbers as well as the launching of various e-services by the government of India has encouraged the use of a smartphone for digital payments. This study is focused on predicting the probability of adoption of e-payment system by the users of smartphones and the prominent factors associated with it among the people of Allahabad city and nearby.
This study yielded a model with two main latent factors, which were found to be directly associated with the adoption of e-payment system by the participants. One of these was concerned with ‘Conviction’ or ‘Conviction and Enthusiasm’ for the adoption of new technology, whereas the other was more of a complex nature with several underlying correlated observable variables. Together these factors were able to predict with high precision the outcome variable i.e. the adoption status of e-payment system by smartphone users. The attitude and the behaviour predisposition of the subjects towards technology have been central to many extant theories however, unlike several of these theories, the present study concludes that these two constructs, attitude and the behaviour towards technology were inconspicuous when used in isolation as a predictor for predicting the likelihood of use of e-payment system by the users of smartphones.
Keywords
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211.
- Dastan,Î., & Gürler,C. (2016). Factors affecting the adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis. Emerging Markets Journal, 6 (1), 16-24.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
- Ericsson. (June, 2017). Ericsson Mobility Report. Stockholm, Sweden: C.S.O. Ericsson.
- Gefen, D., & Straub, D.W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.
- GOI.(2017).digital_payment_methods. Retrieved from cashlessindia.gov.in: http://cashlessindia.gov.in/digital_payment_methods.html
- GOI. (2018).mobile-seva-citizen-services-mobile-phones#moblie1 . Retrieved from india.gov.in:https://www.india.gov.in/spotlight/mobile-seva-citizen-services-mobile-phones#moblie1
- Jengchung, V. C, Yen, D. C., & Chen, K. (2010). The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: A case study of a delivery service company in logistics. Research Express@NCKU, 15(4),1.
- Keith, C., & Hendy, K. M. (1993). Measuring subjective workload: When is one scale better than many?. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35 (4), 579-601.
- Kumar, P. (2013). Electronic shopping: a paradigm shift in buying behaviour among Indian consumers.
- Retrieved December13 ,2017, from Shodhganga@INFLIBNET Centre: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/13562.
- Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use Information Technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management, 40 (3), 191-204.
- Li, L. (2010, March 4). A critical review of Technology Acceptance Literature. Retrieved from South West decision science institute: http://www.swdsi.org/swdsi2010/SW2010_Preceedings/papers/PA104.pdf
- Momani, A.M., & Jamos, M. M. (2017). The evolution of technology acceptance theories. International Journal of Contemporary Computer Research, 1 (1), 51-58.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, Fifth edition. New York: Free Press.
- Sakar, E., Keskin, S., & Unver, H. (2011). Using of factor analysis scores in Multiple linear Regression Model for prediction of Kernal weight in Ankara walnuts. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 21(2), 182185.
- Samaradiwakara, G.D.M.N., & Gunaverdena, C. G. (2014). Comparison of existing technology acceptance theories and models to suggest a well improved theory/model. International Technical Sciences Journal, 1(1), 21-36.
- Sharma,R., & Mishra, R. (2014). A review of evolution of theories and models of technology adoption. The Indore Management Journal, 6(2), 17-29.
- Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- SumHR. (2017). Digital-wallets-india-list-online-payment-gateway. Retrieved from sumhr.com: https://www.sumhr.com/digital-wallets-india-list-online-payment-gateway/
- Surendran, P. (2012). Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(4), 175-178.
- Tahir A. W., & Ali, S. W. (2015). Innovation diffusion theory review & ccope in the study of adoption of smartphones in India. Journal of General Management Research, 3 (2), 101–118.
- Taylor, H. (2016). How-india-is-shaping-the-global-smartphone-market.html. Retrieved from www.cnbc.com:https://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/21/how-india-is-shaping-the-global-smartphone-market.html.
- Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Abstract Views: 329
PDF Views: 0